GHSA-m687-p538-r5hp

Vikunja: Permissive Cross-domain Security Policy trusts every localhost origin which should not be trusted

Published

2026-10-09

Modified

2026-10-09

Sources

github-advisory

Summary

## Summary Vikunja ships with `cors.origins` defaulting to `http://127.0.0.1:*` and `http://localhost:*`, and sends `Access-Control-Allow-Credentials: true`, so a page served from any port on the user's own machine may make credentialed cross-origin requests to the API and read the responses. The mandatory `service.publicurl` is appended to that default list rather than replacing it, so a fully configured production deployment still trusts every localhost origin. Combined with the token refresh endpoint, which authenticates with the `vikunja_refresh_token` cookie and returns a bearer JWT in the response body, one `fetch()` from such a page yields a working access token for whoever is logged in, and from there the whole account. ## Vulnerability Details `cors.enable` defaults to true and `cors.origins` defaults to the two localhost wildcards: https://github.com/go-vikunja/vikunja/blob/a881ac39eecd07575a5aede8e74727c28d5fd578/pkg/config/config.go#L495-L497 The middleware is registered with `AllowCredentials: true` and an `UnsafeAllowOriginFunc` that implements the port wildcard through `matchCORSOrigin`, since Echo v5 will not accept a wildcard port itself: https://github.com/go-vikunja/vikunja/blob/a881ac39eecd07575a5aede8e74727c28d5fd578/pkg/routes/routes.go#L263-L281 The detail that turns a development convenience into a production exposure is the last line of configuration handling. Enabling CORS without a public URL is a fatal error, so every deployment sets one, and that value is *appended* to the origin list rather than substituted for it: https://github.com/go-vikunja/vikunja/blob/a881ac39eecd07575a5aede8e74727c28d5fd578/pkg/config/config.go#L828-L830 An operator who configures nothing but their own hostname therefore ends up allowing three origins with credentials: their site, and any port on `localhost` and `127.0.0.1`. There is no supported configuration in which the localhost entries are quietly dropped, and nothing in the logs distinguishes the intended origin from the inherited ones. The escalation path is the refresh endpoint. It is deliberately unauthenticated because it authenticates with the refresh cookie instead of a bearer token, and it returns the new access token in the JSON body: https://github.com/go-vikunja/vikunja/blob/a881ac39eecd07575a5aede8e74727c28d5fd578/pkg/routes/api/v1/login.go#L129-L150 The cookie is `HttpOnly`, but that offers no protection here, because the attacking page never reads the cookie. It issues a credentialed request and the browser attaches the cookie itself. `SetRefreshTokenCookie` marks the cookie `SameSite=None` whenever the public URL is `https`, precisely so the cookie survives split-origin deployments, which is also what allows a cross-site send from a localhost page: https://github.com/go-vikunja/vikunja/blob/a881ac39eecd07575a5aede8e74727c28d5fd578/pkg/modules/auth/auth.go#L84-L104 So a single `fetch('https://vikunja.example.com/api/v1/user/token/refresh', {method: 'POST', credentials: 'include'})` from any page on any localhost port returns a bearer token for the logged-in user, and the CORS response headers permit the page to read it. The token carries the user's full API authority. ## Proof of Concept Three files, built together in one directory and run with: [poc.zip](https://github.com/user-attachments/files/31917334/poc.zip) ``` docker build -f Dockerfile -t poc . && docker run --rm poc ``` - `Dockerfile` builds Vikunja from commit `a881ac39eecd07575a5aede8e74727c28d5fd578` and bakes the reproducer in. - `poc.sh` is the entrypoint. It starts the application on sqlite with `service.publicurl` as the only setting configured, waits for the health check, and runs the exploit. - `exploit.py` registers a user, logs them in, then acts as a page on `http://localhost:31337`: it reads the refresh cookie attributes, sends the CORS preflight, makes the credentialed refresh request, and asks the API who the returned token belongs to. Nothing is stubbed and no

Affected packages

Remediation: No patched version is listed by GitHub.

References

• https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-m687-p538-r5hp