Comparison
AegiFlow vs Wordfence
The most widely deployed WordPress security plugin, with an application-level firewall and scanner.
Wordfence protects from inside WordPress. AegiFlow operates outside the application, so protection, continuity and recovery keep working even when the site itself is down — the two can coexist.
01
Side by side
Different tools optimize for different problems. This is where each one concentrates.
| Dimension | Wordfence | AegiFlow |
|---|---|---|
| Operating model | A plugin running inside WordPress on the same server as the protected site. | An edge and control plane outside the application; the origin stays private behind mutual TLS. |
| When the site is down | Plugin protection is down together with the site. | Signed static continuity plus recovery drills with receipts — availability is exercised, not assumed. |
| Incident response | Blocking rules, login hardening and scan alerts inside the dashboard. | Correlated cases with one timeline; bounded, reversible controls with a TTL and a tested rollback. |
| State honesty | Scan status and firewall statistics. | A state is shown as verified only while its evidence is recent. Missing checks become Unknown, never green. |
Descriptions of third-party products reflect their public positioning at the time of writing and may change. AegiFlow capability states are shown honestly, including features still in observation.
Other comparisons: AegiFlow vs Cloudflare AegiFlow vs Sucuri AegiFlow vs Patchstack
Judge on evidence, not on claims.
Add a domain in observation and see the operational record build itself.